On December 16, 2021, the Court held the final fairness hearing in this matter. After the Court considers the arguments and materials submitted in support of the settlement, it will issue a formal written order. This process may take some time. Payments will be distributed approximately 30-60 days after receipt of an order approving the settlement in full. We appreciate your patience.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
A class action settlement may affect your rights if you paid Caliber Home Loans, Inc. a fee to make a residential loan payment by telephone, including through the use of the telephonic automated “IVR” (interactive voice response) system, or the internet between January 1, 2013 and January 21, 2020.
THIS NOTICE COULD AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS – PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY
A court authorized this website. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (the “Court”) authorized this Website. This website is a summary of a Proposed Settlement of three class action lawsuits titled Phillips, et al. v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Case No. 0:19-cv-02711 (D. Minn.), Barnett, et al. v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Case No. 2:19-cv-309 (S.D. Tex.), and Davis, et al. v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.., Case No. 1:20-cv-00338 (M.D. N.C.). The three cases have been consolidated for Settlement before the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. Stephen Phillips, Mary Tourville-Phillips, Sandi Barnett, Gregory Benjamin, Tyrus Davis, and Christopher Bingham (“Plaintiffs”) sued Caliber Home Loans, Inc., alleging that Caliber charged borrowers fees to make mortgage payments online or over the phone, including through the use of the telephonic automated “IVR” (interactive voice response) system (“Pay-to-Pay fees”). The Action asserts that Caliber’s practice of charging such fees, among other things, violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1692f(1), various state debt collection laws, and breached the terms of the borrowers’ loan agreements. Caliber denies the allegations asserted in the Actions. The Court has not decided who is right. The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (the “Court”) authorized this Notice. This Notice is a summary of a Proposed Settlement of three class action lawsuits titled Phillips, et al. v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Case No. 0:19-cv-02711 (D. Minn.), Barnett, et al. v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Case No. 2:19-cv-309 (S.D. Tex.), and Davis, et al. v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.., Case No. 1:20-cv-00338 (M.D. N.C.). The three cases have been consolidated for Settlement before the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. Stephen Phillips, Mary Tourville-Phillips, Sandi Barnett, Gregory Benjamin, Tyrus Davis, and Christopher Bingham (“Plaintiffs”) sued Caliber Home Loans, Inc., alleging that Caliber charged borrowers fees to make mortgage payments online or over the phone, including through the use of the telephonic automated “IVR” (interactive voice response) system (“Pay-to-Pay fees”). The Action asserts that Caliber’s practice of charging such fees, among other things, violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1692f(1), various state debt collection laws, and breached the terms of the borrowers’ loan agreements. Caliber denies the allegations asserted in the Actions. The Court has not decided who is right.
